Hold zero to five cards, then draw once
After the opening five cards appear, the player selects which to retain. Unheld cards are replaced from the remaining deck. The final hand is evaluated against the chosen schedule, and only the highest qualifying combination is paid for that hand.
A hand that qualifies as a Straight Flush does not also receive separate Flush and Straight awards. The hierarchy determines one settlement. That prevents a common overcount when several descriptive properties apply to the same five cards.
Jacks or Better uses a high-pair threshold
The checked schedule pays on a pair of Jacks or higher, with Two Pair paying two units, Three of a Kind three, Straight four, Flush six and Full House nine. Four of a Kind pays 25, Straight Flush 50 and Royal Flush 800 units per unit staked on that hand.
These are paytable returns, not roulette-style profit odds with the stake added again. A €0.50 hand ending in Two Pair returns €1. Its net profit is €0.50. A qualifying high pair returns the €0.50 stake amount and therefore produces no net profit on that hand.
Tens or Better lowers one threshold but reduces other awards
Tens or Better accepts a pair of tens as the lowest paying pair. In the published schedule, Four of a Kind pays 20, Full House six and Flush five, compared with 25, nine and six in the listed Jacks or Better version.
The extra qualifying pair does not automatically make the table more generous overall. Its stated optimal RTP is lower. This is a useful example of why a single favourable rule must be read alongside the rest of the payout schedule.
Deuces Wild changes the role of every two
In Deuces Wild, twos can substitute to form combinations. The schedule distinguishes a natural Royal Flush from a Royal Flush completed with Wild cards, and it pays separately for Four Deuces and Five of a Kind.
The documented returns are 800 for a natural Royal Flush, 200 for Four Deuces and 25 for a Wild Royal Flush. The minimum paying hand is Three of a Kind. A pair alone does not pay merely because Jacks or Better was the previously selected option.
Bonus Poker separates some Four of a Kind ranks
Bonus Poker gives Four Aces 80 units, Four 2s, 3s or 4s 40 units, and other Four of a Kind hands 25 units. Its Full House and Flush awards are eight and five. The rank of a completed four-of-a-kind hand therefore matters to its settlement.
That change is not a random bonus event after the draw. It is part of the selected paytable. The word Bonus should not be confused with a casino account promotion or a slot-style feature purchase.
Double Double Bonus makes the kicker relevant
Double Double Bonus adds premium awards involving the fifth card alongside Four of a Kind. Four Aces with a 2, 3 or 4 kicker pays 400 units, while Four Aces with a higher kicker pays 160. Four 2s, 3s or 4s with an eligible low kicker pays 160; with a higher kicker it pays 80.
The schedule also pays only one unit for Two Pair, compared with two in the listed Jacks or Better and Bonus Poker schedules. The premium four-of-a-kind awards therefore come with trade-offs elsewhere. Describing only the 400-unit result would conceal a change that affects far more ordinary paying hands.
Extra hands multiply the accepted stake
At €0.20 per hand, ten hands cost €2 and 100 hands cost €20. If a ten-hand round returns €1.60 across all final hands, the net result is a €0.40 loss, even if several individual hands display winning combinations.
The session accounting guide uses the same full-cost principle. Record the number of hands, the stake per hand and the sum returned. Do not divide the final total by one hand’s stake and present that ratio as the return on the complete round.
A shared starting deal creates correlation
Suppose the initial five cards already form a Royal Flush and all are held. The held combination is carried to the additional hands, so those results share the same completed starting hand. Conversely, drawing towards an incomplete combination does not guarantee that any additional hand will finish it.
Separate replacement decks do not make the original deal independent across hands. This distinction is useful when interpreting a large multi-hand payout: the number of winning hands can reflect one shared starting event rather than many unrelated rare deals.
The default decision is assistance, not proof of optimality
The published rules explicitly warn that the default recommendation is not always optimal. If no hold choice is made, the game can apply a default decision. That convenience should not be treated as a certified strategy for every paytable and every hand.
A meaningful decision check needs the complete five cards and the selected payout schedule. A cropped pair or three-card fragment is not enough to assess the hold. The demo-mode guide explains how a practice interface can help with controls without proving long-run returns.